Russian

Alexandr A.Shpilman (alexandrshpilman78@gmail.com )

 

The inviolability of constants

Most people, without thinking, are confident in the constancy and immutability of such “constants” as dielectric (ε0) and magnetic permeability (µ0), and the vacuum refractive index (n0). But the Earth's gravitational field can be represented as a change in the refractive index of vacuum. Moreover, a change in n0 by one billionth is sufficient to ensure the current force of gravity on the Earth's surface.

 

n n0 *(1+1*10-9)

 

In the article “Interesting Relationships” it was concluded that the wave impedance of the vacuum (ρe) in the vicinity of the electron is more than sixty times greater than the wave impedance of the vacuum for the photon.

 

ρe / ρ0 ≈ 137 / 2

 

It was possible to determine that in the vicinity of atomic nuclei the dielectric constant of vacuum (ε0) changes. Correction factors were introduced into the calculations... and forgotten...

I.M. Matora in the article “Model of Structure Electron and Muon” writes:

As an initial premise for the model of the structure of the electron and muon, we will accept the universality of the known magnetic flux quantum discovered in the study of macroscopic superconducting rings.

 

More precisely, its meaning

 

Ô0 =h*c/(2*e) = 2.06785E-7

 

Those, in constructing the electron model, the author did not even think about the possible change in the characteristics of the vacuum on such a small scale (10-14 - 10-108 cm) and the colossal magnetic field induction (1010 – 10109 Gauss)! In addition, the author did not clearly justify the stability of his model of the electron in the form of an electric charge in the form of a torus, rotating with an azimuthal speed equal to the speed of light (c).

 

To put it simply, let’s imagine a circular turn of an electric superconducting wire with a certain current flowing through it. The coil will be acted upon by forces that tear it apart, caused by the pressure of the magnetic field and the repulsion of like electric charges. For clarity, let’s take an electric coil as an example:

 

The magnetic field from the electric current flowing into such a coil will be mainly concentrated inside the coil.

The magnetic field will press the turns of the coil against each other and at the same time the field will tend to tear them apart. The force breaking the coils will be equal to:

 

F   dW/dr   µ0 *H2 *dV/dr

 

Where:

W – magnetic field energy stored in the coil,

H – magnetic field strength,

V – coil internal volume,

r – radius of coil turns.

 

We know that the iron core is drawn into the coil and accordingly the turns of the coil are attracted to the iron core. Those. If an iron core is placed inside the coil, then we can compensate for the force breaking the coil; for this, it is enough that the magnetic permeability of the core (µ) is more than twice the magnetic permeability of air.

It’s funny, the ratio of the electron’s dipole magnetic moment to its mechanical moment is twice as large as expected.

 

ge = 2,002 319 304 361 53

 

By increasing the magnetic permeability of the “core” it is possible to compensate for the electrostatic forces of repulsion of like electric charges, but there is another option. If you rub a glass rod on wool, electrical charges will appear on the surface of the glass, which will not be in a hurry to leave the glass rod. Those, by doubling the dielectric constant of the vacuum (ε) inside the torus of I.M. Matora’s electron model, we can compensate for the repulsion forces of like electric charges.

There is another option, if we imagine that in I.M. Matora’s model it is not electric charges that move around the ring, but a soliton of an electromagnetic wave propagating, then for the stability of such movement it is enough that the refractive index of the vacuum in the vicinity of the ring changes according to the following law:

 

n 2*k*n0*R0/R

 

Where:

R0 – large radius of the torus in the model of I.M. Matora’s,

k – some proportionality coefficient.

 

An interesting situation: if the dielectric and magnetic permeability are doubled, then the refractive index of the vacuum will automatically be twice as large.

Twice... but, but, if the wave impedance of the vacuum (ρ) increases by 137/2 times, then the change in dielectric and magnetic permeability changes significantly more. And the model of I.M. Matora’s is transformed into Lissajous figures?

 

Thematic Contents

CONTENTS