Alexander A.Shpilman ( alexandrshpilman78@gmail.com )
"Long-distance communication" on
"axion fields"
Now there are reports about alleged discoveries
of signal transmission over long distances, through "torsion fields",
through "non-local influence", etc. Let's try to consider different
interpretations of the observed:
1)
We
observe the statistical error of recognition a weak signal against a high level
of interference. And the wish is given as actual.
2) The detector remains connected with the
source of the "axion field" after its action. This connection also remains when the
detector and source are removed on large distances. A signal can be transmitted over long distances
through this connection.
Communication can also be established through the surrounding objects that are
present during the initial irradiation (imprinting). "The surrounding
subject" can be the experimenter himself. There is one of the variants-analogies this mechanism of such a
connection: We screwed and unscrewed the screw from the iron bolt. Then, the
bolt and nut were taken away in different directions for many kilometers. There
was no direct contact between them, but this contact remained in the past.
Probably, the connection between objects is possible through their close
contact in the past and in the future. See Time - Overtime .
3)
The
connection between the source of the "axion field" and the detector,
whether voluntarily or not, can initiate the experimenter's thought/desire.
4)
Developing
the idea of point 3, the entities, personalities and egregors of "subtle
worlds" can act as a mediator of communication.
The question arises - how can we to verify
these assumptions?
Point 1 –we can use standard scientific
methods.
Point 2 – we can check. Try to break the established connection between the source and the
detector. For example,
to act on the detector with another, more powerful source of the "axion
field" or make a short-term exposure to a strong magnetic field.
In addition, measure the receiver's
readings when the detector is weakened by a protective shield. Do the same
measurement, spreading over long distances the detector and the source of the
"axion field." At the second stage, conduct a direct irradiation of
the detector, removing the shielding protection. Then restore the screening
protection of the detector, check the signal level from the source at short and
long distances. It is likely that the signal level will be higher than in the
first version.